HARBHAJAN SINGH KHALSA YOGIJI, a/k/a "Harbhajan Puri", a/k/a/ "Yogi Bhajan," a/k/al "Sin Singh Sahib", Individually, and In His Capacity as the Sole Officer and Director of the "Sin Singh Sahib of Sikh Dharma Brotherhood," a California Corporation, and in his Capacity as an Officer of the " Sikh Dharma Brotherhood, a California Corporation, and in this capacity as an officer and director of the "3H0 Foundation," a California Corporation, and the "3H0 Foundation of New Mexico," a New Mexico Corporation; and

INDERJIT ("BIBIJI") KAUR KHALSA,

SHAKTI PARWHA KAUR KHALSA, Individually, and In Her Capacity as a Director of the 3H0 Foundation, and an Officer of the "Sikh Dharma Brotherhood;" and

GURU AMRIT KAUR KHALSA, Individually, and In Her Capacity as Secretary General of the "Sikh Dharma Brotherhood;" and

GURUKE KAUR KHALSA, Individually and In Her Capacity as an Officer of the "Sikh Dharma Brotherhood."

2. Defendant Harbhajan Singh Khalsa Yogiji, formerly known as Harbhajan Puri and also known as "Yogi Bhajan" and "Siri Singh Sahib," (hereinafter "Bhajan"), is an adult citizen of the State of California, with his principal residence at 1620 Preuss Road, Los Angeles, California 90035.

3. Defendant Sin Singh Sahib of Sikh Dharma Brotherhood is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 1649 Robertson Building, Los Angeles, California 90035. This corporation is of a unique type, known under California law as a "corporation sole." (Hereinafter this corporation shall be referred to as the "corporation sole.")

4. Defendant 3H0 Foundation is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of California, and doing business in the State of New Mexico under a Certificate of Authority issued by the New Mexico State Corporation Commission. The principal place of business of the 3H0 Foundation is located at 1649 Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90035. "3H0" is an acronym for "HealthyHappyHoly Organization."

5. Defendant Sikh Dharma Brotherhood is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 1649 Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, California. (To avoid confusion with a religious order in India called the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood, this corporate entity shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation.")

6. Defendant 3H0 Foundation of New Mexico is an "affiliate" of defendant 3H0 Foundation, and is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of New Mexico. The principal place of business of defendant 3H0 Foundation of New Mexico is Route 1, Box 132-D, Espanola, New Mexico 87532.

7. Defendant Inderjit ("Bibiji") Kaur Khalsa is, upon information and belief, the legal wife of defendant Bhajan, as well as an officer of defendant 3H0 Foundation. Defendant Inderjit ("Bibiji") Kaur Khalsa (hereinafter Bibiji) is a citizen of India, with her principal U.S. residence at 219 Amhurst, S.E., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106.

8. Defendant Shakti Parwha Kaur Khalsa is an individual and citizen of the State of California, with her principal residence at 1620 Preuss Road, Los Angeles, California. Defendant Shakti Parwha Kaur Khalsa (hereinafter "Shakti") is sued in her individual capacity, as well as in her capacity as an officer and Director of the defendant 3H0 Foundation, an officer and Director of the defendant 3H0 Foundation of New Mexico, and an Officer of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood.

9. Defendant Guru Amrit Kaur Khalsa is an individual and a citizen of the State of California, with her principal residence at 8832 Pickford Street, Los Angeles, California 90035. Guru Amrit Kaur Khalsa (hereinafter referred to as "Amrit Kaur") is sued in her individual capacity, and as the chief administrative officer of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation.

12. Count V of this Complaint arises under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1964 ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. SS19611968. Jurisdiction to hear this case is therefore vested in this Court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S1964(c) and 28 U.S.C. S1331(a).

15. Each of the corporate defendants named in this case owns property and/or does business within the District of New Mexico, and each of the individual defendants named in this case resides within the District of New Mexico either fulltime or parttime. Venue is therefore properly laid in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S1391(b).

19. The method by which Bhajan induced others to follow him was to pose as a Yoga master and teacher, and then covertly subject yoga students to a process of mental and emotional conditioning in which their personalities are disrupted and ultimately destroyed, and then are supplanted with a "reformed" personality ("reformed" in this context having its most literal meaning of "making over" or "forming again"). This reformed personality is, by design, intellectually, emotionally and ideologically committed exclusively to Bhajan and the service of Bhajan. Once a follower is in this condition, he or she becomes part of Bhajans cult following, and is invariably exploited by Bhajan for whatever Bhajan can get out of the follower, be that money, property, sex, labor, administrative or business skill or assistance, or social or political contacts, prestige or credibility. This process is, by design, carried out without the knowledge or understanding of the inductee, and was carried out upon the plaintiff in this case.

21. In 1973 Bhajan caused the incorporation of the defendant Sikh Dharma Brotherhood Corporation to occur. This corporation was organized for the ostensible purpose of "teaching the principles of the Sikh Dharma, or way of life, in the Western Hemisphere." In truth and in fact, defendant Sikh Dharma Brotherhood Corporation was and is used as a vehicle through which Bhajan operates his cult. The Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation was and is totally controlled in every respect by Bhajan directly, and is used in every respect for Bhajans own, personal benefit. The Sikh Dharma Brotherhood Corporation was, and always has been, so dominated and controlled by Bhajan that it neither had nor has any independent personality or existence of its own.

22. At the time of the incorporation of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, and at all times material to this Complaint, defendant Bhajan was an officer and Director the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, bearing the title "Sin Singh Sahib."

24. From 1983 onward, defendant Bibiji was an officer of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, holding or purporting to hold the title "Siri Sardarni Kaur." The title "Siri Sardarni Kaur" is the female counterpart of "Siri Singh Sahib," and is a high office within the corporation.

25. From November, 1984, and continuing to the present, defendant Amrit Kaur has been the "Secretary General" of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, which is the chief executive officer of the corporation, and the leaden of the "Khalsa Council," which is ostensibly the governing body (on Board of Directors) of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation.

26. In 1975, Bhajan caused the incorporation of defendant Sin Singh Sahib of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood as a "corporation sole" pursuant to the California Corporations Code SlO,000, et. seq., for the ostensible purpose of managing the "affairs, property and temporalities of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood. In truth and in fact the corporation sole was and is used as a vehicle through which Bhajan shelters personal property and wealth from state and federal taxation and his lawful creditors. The corporation sole is totally controlled in every respect by Bhajan directly, and is used in every respect for his own, personal benefit. The corporation sole was, and always has been, so dominated and controlled by Bhajans personal interests that it has no independent personality or existence of its own.

28. All of the acts of any of the defendants described in this Complaint were carried out using the resources, facilities, and personnel of the corporate defendants, with the full knowledge and approval of all corporate officers and directors, as part of and pursuant to an established and ongoing corporate policy of carrying out the commands and directives of Bhajan, no matter what those demands and directive may be. Each of the corporate defendants is associated in fact with each of the other corporate defendants, under the common control of Bhajan, and with the common purpose and objective of carrying out Bhajans wishes, including but not limited to the tortuous conduct set forth below.

32. Defendant Amrit Kaur is the plaintiffs natural sister. In the fall of 1974 Amrit Kaur began to communicate to the plaintiff a series of misrepresentations of fact (including material omissions of fact), which were designed to entice the plaintiff into Bhajans organization. Amrit Kaur made these misrepresentations directly to the plaintiff by Bhajan, or at the direction of Bhajan. These misrepresentations were made in letters and by telephone, and were all repeated many different times to the plaintiff. These misrepresentations began in June, 1972, and were repeated on a weekly basis until the fall of 1975. They included, inter alia :

(d) That 3H0 was a charitable organization dedicated to "the advancement of individuals through education and science," when in fact it was an organization dedicated to the ostensibly religious objectives of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, and in reality to the personal objectives and benefit of Bhajan himself.

33. Additional misrepresentations of fact and material omissions were made to the plaintiff by Bhajan and Amrit Kaur at the behest of Bhajan for the specific purpose of inducing the plaintiff to spend the summer of 1975 at the groups compound in Espanola, New Mexico, called the "womens camp." These misrepresentations were made over the telephone and in letters, beginning in March, 1975, and were repeated on a weekly basis through the first week of July, 1975. These material misrepresentations and omissions included, inter alia:

(a) That at the womens camp the plaintiffs would have the opportunity to do womens studies. In truth there were no such opportunities, nor was that the purpose of the camp. Womens studies were actually discouraged. Indeed, in 1975 the womens camp was not even for women (there were both men and women staying at the compound).

(b) That at the camp there were horses that could be ridden recreationally. Although there were horses at the camp, in truth they were being boarded there for the horses owners and were not available for recreational riding by the plaintiff.

(c) That the plaintiff would have an organized series of classes and lectures on subjects including new music, martial arts, womens studies, vegetarian cooking, child rearing and similar subjects. In truth and in fact there were no such classes and lectures available, the only lectures available being indoctrination lectures by Bhajan.

truth and in fact she was not to be permitted to think or find answers to questions, "spiritual" or otherwise. Rather, she was covertly manipulated from the time she arrived at the camp until the time she became a follower of Bhajan, and was severely limited in her ability and opportunity to engage in rational reflection or independent thought.

(e) That the plaintiffs attendance at the camp would be as Bhajans personal guest, and that she would not have to pay for room or board or any other fees. In truth and in fact it was Bhajans intent to first induct the plaintiff into his cult, and then charge her fees for staying at the camp, which he ultimately did.

34. The plaintiff relied upon all of the foregoing misrepresentations and material omissions, in agreeing to travel from her home in Montana to the "womens camp," and later in agreeing to stay at the "womens camp," and to pay Bhajan money for her stay at the camp.

35. Within a week of the plaintiffs arrival at the "womens camp," in July 1975, the plaintiff was addressed by Bhajan in a private audience. At that time, and on a virtually daily basis throughout the summer of 1975, Bhajan made a number of specific false promises to the plaintiff and misrepresenta-tions of fact, in order to induce the pla intiff to remain at the womens camp until she could be indoctrinated, and to facilitate the thought reform process. Bhajan made all the false promises orally, and the other misrepresentations of fact were made both by Bhajan orally, and by Amrit Kaur and others at Bhajans direction in articles, brochures, magazines and various writings produced and distributed to the plaintiff by the corporate defendants named herein. These promises and representations were false, and Bhajan and the other defendants knew them to be false at the time he made them. They included, inter alia:

(a) That he would personally instruct the plaintiff and oversee the plaintiffs education if she remained in the group, studied under Bhajan, and became his follower.

(b) That if the plaintiff studied under him and agreed to stay with him, Bhajan would provide for all of her physical and economic needs, so that she could devote her full time and attention to learning, education and "spiritual advancement."

36. In addition to the foregoing general misrepresenta-tions, Bhajan also made a number of knowing misrepresentations to the plaintiff while she was at the womens camp that related specifically to his status as a teacher, representative and leader of the Sikh religion of India. These misrepresentations were also made on virtually a daily basis from July 1975 through September, 1975, both orally and in articles, brochures and other promotional materials produced by the defendants, and were made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to remain at the womens camp until she could be indoctrinated, and to facilitate the thought reform process. These representations were false, and Bhajan knew them to be false at the time he made them. They included, inter alia:

(a) That he was an "avatar," which means a reincarnation of God. Bhajan has never believed this of himself.

(b) That the form of religious practice observed by Bhajans followers was ancient in origin, and was followed worldwide by those professing to be Sikhs, including the Sikhs of India. In truth, Bhajan well knew the religious beliefs and practices espoused by Bhajan are not of ancient origin, are only superficially based upon the Sikh religion as it was practiced prior to the founding of Bhajans organizations, and are very different from or contrary to the Sikh religion as it was practiced in India prior to the founding of Bhajans organizations.

(c) That in 1971 he was appointed by the governing body of the Sikh religion at Amritsar, India (the Shiromani Gurdware Parbandhak Committee) as the "Sin Singh Sahib," and that this title and office were those of the chief religious leader of the Sikhs in the Western Hemisphere. In truth and in fact, Bhajan never did receive any such appointment, and indeed there is no body within the Sikh religion which as the power to make such an appointment, nor is there any such office within the Sikh religion as it is known and practiced in India. Moreover, the title "Sin Singh Sahib" is not a title of religious significance to the Sikhs of India, and is nothing more than a respectful mode of address used by one Sikh when addressing another.

(e) That he had over 250,000 followers, mostly of Indian birth. In truth and in fact he had never had in excess of a few thousand followers, and few, if any, of his followers were or are of Indian birth (other than Bhajans wife).

(f) That he had washed the floors of the Golden Temple at Amritsar, India for four years to "purify himself," when in fact he had never done so.

37. At no time material to this Complaint has Bhajan entertained a sincere belief in the religion he espouses to his followers, or to the Sikh religion as it was practiced prior to the founding of Bhajans organizations. Nor .has Bhajan ever personally acted in accordance with the teachings, tenets or practices of the religion he espouses to his followers, or of the Sikh religion as it was practiced prior to the founding of Bhajans organizations. Rather, Bhajans professed religious beliefs and objectives are espoused by him in bad faith, for the purpose of bolstering his credibility with the public and potential recruits, obtaining favorable tax treatment from the government of the United States and various states, concealing the covert manipulation he engages in to effect the thought reform process to which the plaintiff in this case was subjected, and justifying to his followers some of the arbitrary, cruel, bizarre and exploitive actions he takes with respect to his followers.

38. In addition to the foregoing general misrepresentations and misrepresentations pertaining to his status and affiliation with the Sikh religion, Bhajan also made a number of knowing misrepresentations to the plaintiff while she was at the "womens camp" which specifically related to his status as a master and teacher of all forms of yoga. These misrepresentations were initially made at plaintiffs private audience with Bhajan, and also made on virtually a daily basis from July 1975 through September 1975, orally and in articles, brochures and other promotional materials produced by the defendants. These misrepresentations were made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to remain at the "womens camp" until she could be indoctrinated, and to facilitate the thought reform process. These representations were false, and Bhajan knew them to be false at the time he made them. They included, inter alia:

(b) That the forms of yoga which Bhajan taught were ancient forms of "Kundalini" and "Tantric yoga," when in fact they were a collection of exercises put together by Bhajan, sometimes literally made up on the spot by Bhajan as a yoga class progressed.

(f) That in 1971 Bhajan was bestowed with unique skills and knowledge by a yoga teacher known as the "Mahan Tantric," who had selected Bhajan to be his successor and who bestowed the title of "Mahan Tantric" upon Bhajan when the former "Mahan Tantric" died. In truth Bhajan did not study under the "Mahan Tantric," nor was he ever vested with any such title by anyone previously holding the title.

(h) That special diets prescribed for the plaintiff would have curative and beneficial effects upon the plaintiffs health, when in fact Bhajan knew they would not. In truth the special diets prescribed by Bhajan were designed to mentally debilitate the plaintiff and place her in a state of extreme suggestibility, which state was then exploited by Bhajan and his followers as part of the though reform process the plaintiff was subjected to.

39. In reliance upon the foregoing misrepresentations and material omissions, among others, the plaintiff remained at the womens camp throughout the summer of 1975, despite uncomfortable conditions there, and paid Bhajan money for her stay there. More important, in reliance upon the foregoing misrepresentations and material omissions, among others, the plaintiff altered her lifestyle and educational plans, and affiliated herself with Bhajans cult, thereby permitting herself, at the age of fourteen, to be subjected initially to the thought reform process perpetuated by the defendants.

40. As part of the thought reform process to which plaintiff was subjected, and continuing as a means of maintaining and reinforcing the effects of that process after the initial thought reform process was effected, Bhajan routinely prescribed numerous bizarre and unhealthful fasts and diets for the plaintiff. These fasts and diets were prescribed for the ostensible purpose of "curing" various physical, psychological or emotional ailments, real or imagined, upon the false representation that Bhajan was specially trained, as well as divinely inspired, to diagnose physical ills and ailments.

41. Similarly, Bhajan also prescribed a regimen of work, fasting, chanting, debilitating yoga exercises, and reading and listening to lectures by Bhajan, as well as long hours of prayer and repetition of his name, as a means of limiting the plaintiffs sleep and time to contemplate and reflect upon her circumstances.

42. Through this regulation and regimen, the plaintiff was kept isolated from former friends, family and outside influences, and was rendered physically and psychologically debilitated and unable to exercise normal judgment or self protective care. While the plaintiff was kept in this vulnerable state, the defendants constantly made and repeated material misrepresentations of fact and material omissions pertaining to Bhajan and his organizations, including but not limited to all of the misrepresentations set forth above. Bhajan, and the other defendants at the direction of Bhajan repeated these misrepresentations, so frequently that the number of times they were repeated cannot be exhaustively listed. These mis-representations were institutionalized by the defendants, woven into the fabric of the daily life of any member of Bhajans group, and were repeated to the plaintiff on a virtually daily basis at all times during which the plaintiff was living at any of the communal centers operate by Bhajans group. These times included, but were not limited to, the entire period from June 1978 through and including February 1985.

(a) In a pamphlet entitled "Sikh Dharma: Another Way to Live, Another Way to God," published throughout the period from at least June, 1978 through February, 1985 by defendant Sikh Dharma corporation at the instruction of Bhajan, all of the mis-representations set forth in paragraphs 35 and 38, above are repeated.

(b) At gatherings of the group in Espanola, New Mexico on and around the twentyfirst of June, and in Florida on and around the twentythird of December, for each year from 1976 through and including 1984, all of the misrepresentations set forth in paragraphs 35 and 38, above, were repeated by Bhajan personally, as well as by the other defendants in this case.

(c) Specific misrepresentations as to Bhajans appointment as the "Sin Singh Sahib," as set forth in paragraph 36(c) above, were made in the following publications, among others:

(i) "The Sin Singh Sahib," Beads of Truth, Bead No. 36 (1977) at pages 3638;

(ii) "Time Will Tell," Beads of Truth, Bead No. 36 (1977) at pages 3941;

(iii) "Address of M.S.S. Guru Terath Singh Khalsa to Khalsa Council, Los Angeles, California, April 17, 1979" as reprinted in Beads of Truth, Bead No. 3, Vol. II (Fall, Sept. 1979) at page 36;

(iv) "Sikh Darma: Another Way to Live, Another Way to God," authored by S.S. Gurubanda Singh Khalsa, Beads of Truth, Beads No. 1 and 2, Vol. II (Apr. 1, 1979) at page 71;

(v) The Man Called the Sin Singh Sahib, (produced and published by 3H0 Foundation and Sikh Darma Corporation) (1979) at pages 15, 38, 60, 78, 86, 118, 123, 125126 and 132;

(vi) "Sikh Darma: Past, Present and Future," by Mukhia Sadarni Sahika, Premka Kaur, Sikh Darma Brotherhood (Winter, 1975) at page 4.

(d) Specific misrepresentations as to Bhajans study of Kundalini and Tantric yoga, as set forth in paragraph 38(a) (b) and (e), and his title as Mahan Tantric as set forth in paragraph 38(f), above, were made in, among others, the following publications:

(i) "The Sin Singh Sahib," Beads of Truth, Bead No. 36 (1977) at pages 3638;

(ii) "Time Will Tell," Beads of Truth, Bead No. 36 (1977) pages 3941;

(iii) "3H0s Summer Solstice," by Alan Tobey, Beads of Truth, No.s 1 and 2, Vol. II (April 1979) at page 15;

(iv) The Man Called The Sin Singh Sahib, supra, at pages 2526, 3536, 120, 141, 154155 and 157;

(v) "Kundalini Yoga," S. S. Gurudain Singh Khalsa, Beads of Truth, Bead No. 3 (Winter, March 1978) pages 2 4.

(i) "The Voice of Prophecy,"Beads of Truth, Bead No. 14, Vol. II (Winter 1984) pages 510.

(f) Specific misrepresentations as to Bhajans washing the marble floors of the temple at Amritsrr, India every day for four years were made in, among others, the following publications:

(i) "Guru Guru Wahe Guru Guru Ram Das Guru," Sikh Danma, Vol. III, No. 4 (winter 1978) pages 89;

(b) That Bhajan has given himself to the service of "God and guru" (p.10). In truth and in fact, Bhajan has no good faith belief that he is serving "God or guru," but rather is devoted to serving himself by obtaining his followers money, talents and sexual services.

(c) That Bhajans family was wealthy and the familys combined land holdings included the entire village in India where Bhajan was born (pp.19 and 35).

(d) That Bhajans birthday was a festive occasion in the town of his birth, and that baby Bhajans weight in gold, silver and copper coins and wheat was distributed to the poor of the village (p.19).

(e) That Bhajan was the only male child at the girls convent school in his village, and that he frequently "unnerved" the Mother Superior with his "profound and unanswerable" questions (p.19).

(g) That Bhajan singlehandedly led his family and entire village, as well as many people from surrounding villages, to safety when the partition of India and Pakistan occurred in 1947, saving them from "roving bands of murderous Muslim bandits" (pp.2627).

(i) "Address of M.S.S. Guru Tenath Singh Khalsa to Khalsa Council, Los Angeles, California, April 17, 1978" as reprinted in Beads of Truth, Bead No. 3, Vol. II (Fall, Sept. 1979) at page 36.

(ii) "The Sin Singh Sahib," Beads of Truth, Bead No. 36 (1977) at pages 3638.

46. In reliance upon the foregoing misrepresentations and material omissions, the plaintiff: (1) worked thousands of hours for Bhajan and the other defendants, without minimum wage and overtime compensation required by law (as is more fully set forth in Count VI, below); (2) worked thousands of additional hours for Bhajan and the other defendants with no compensation at all; (3) paid Bhajan and the corporate defendants for various "yoga" lessons and courses which were not what they were represented to be; (4) paid Bhajan and defendants 3H0 Foundation and 3H0 Foundation of New Mexico room and board and for various trips to and from summer and winter solstice celebrations held annually by Bhajan and his organization; (5) forwent career and educational opportunities for the period from July, 1975 through February, 1985, SO that she could serve Bhajan and the defendant corporations; and (6) gave her (fraudulently induced and uninformed) consent to a variety of extreme and outrageous practices (as are more fully set forth in Counts II, III, IV, and VII, below).

48. The first such misrepresentations were made in order to induce the plaintiff to turn over formulas she had developed for hair and skin care products to Bhajan, to be in turn turned over to a Los Angeles company controlled by Bhajan. In September, 1983, Bhajan personally represented to the plaintiff that if she would turn over her formulas for shampoo, hair rinse, hair conditioner, and other cosmetics which she had developed to "Sunshine Scents" or "Sunshine Oils" (now known as Khalsa Sunshine, Inc., hereinafter "Sunshine"), the plaintiff would receive a ten percent ownership interest in a division of Sunshine which was then being created, as well as a seat on the Board of Directors of the corporation. The division was called Oriental Beauty Secrets, which was then preparing to market a line of "natural" hair and skin care products, including those developed by the plaintiff.

50. In reliance upon the foregoing representations, the plaintiff turned her formulas over to Bhajan on October 13, 1983. These formulas were turned over to Sunshine, incorporated into a line of Oriental Beauty Secrets cosmetics, and were marketed from early 1984 through 1985, and to the best of the plaintiffs knowledge and information are still being marketed.

52. In December 1984, the plaintiff discovered that her products were actually being marketed, and that she was not being compensated as promised. The plaintiff protested vigorously to Bhajan and the Chancellor the 3110 Foundation, demanding that she be compensated and that the agreement regarding her formulas be reduced to writing. In response, the plaintiff was presented with documents by Bhajan and an "Assistant Chancellor" of the 3H0 Foundation, Ram Das Singh Khalsa, which they represented to the plaintiff were documents which conveyed to her an interest in Oriental Beauty Secrets, and made her an officer of the corporation. These representations were false, and Bhajan and 3H0 counsel knew they were false at the time they were made. These false representations were made solely for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to refrain from further protests (particularly public protests), or from taking any legal or other action to obtain the compensation she was promised. In reliance upon the promises and representations set forth in those documents, the plaintiff did so refrain.

54. At a subsequent meeting, also held in February 1984, Sopurkh Kaur Khalsa reiterated the representations set forth in the next preceding paragraph, and in addition stated the plaintiff s salary as $1,200.00 per month.

55. The representations made in the nextpreceding two paragraphs were made by Bhajan and the 3110 Foundation for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to develop the recipes in question, and then surrender the recipes to Bhajan.

56. In reliance upon the representations set forth in paragraphs 53 and 54, above, the plaintiff commenced research, and ultimately developed recipes for seven different candy bars. These recipes were then turned over to Bhajan, who turned them over to Golden Temple Bakery, and ultimately all seven of the plaintiffs recipes were used to produce and market candy bars. The candy bars produced form the plaintiffs recipes were sold throughout several states in the Western part of the United States from the summer of 1984 through and including the present.

59. In reliance upon these promises and representa-tions, the plaintiff worked from August 1984 through February 1985, developing cookie recipes and turning them over to Nanak Cookie Company. Four of her recipes were in fact produced and marketed by Nanak Cookie Company, under the names Lemon Up," "Ginger Zap," "Paradise Pistachio," and "Raisin Oaties."

61. On the whole, the entire creation and operation of the corporation sole, the 3H0 Foundation and Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, as created by Bhajan and operated by the defendants, was all part of a unified scheme of deceit. Rather than being nonprofit eleemosynary or religious organizations, these organizations were created and totally controlled by Bhajan in order for Bhajan to obtain sex, money, property, power, constant personal attention and selfaggrandizement.

62. As a direct, proximate and foreseeable consequence of the defendants acts as set forth above, the plaintiff has suffered the following physical, psychological and economic injury:

(a) She has paid thousands of dollars to Bhajan, directly and through the corporate defendants, for various lectures, classes and stays at the "womens camp," which were not what they purported to be, and which were not only worthless, but which were actually extremely harmful to the plaintiff.

(g) The plaintiff has suffered a wide variety of physical injuries resulting from her being subjected to the thought reform process ç3escribed above, and the methods employed to effect that thought reform process. These physical injuries include hypoglycemia; severe loss of weight; malnutrition; headaches; chronic exhaustion; and other psychophysiologic disorders.

(i) As a result of the aforementioned physical and psychological injuries, the plaintiff has been limited in the kind of employment she has been able to accept since she left the defendants cult, and will continue to be so limited on into the future.

(j) As a consequence of the injury suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiff was rendered incapable of understanding or perceiving the nature or consequences of her actions, including but not limited to her relationship with the defendants and the defendants relationship with the plaintiff. Until at least the fall of 1985, the plaintiff specifically lacked any comprehension of the type, extent or manner of her injuries, the mechanism by which the defendants caused her injuries, or even the fact that the defendants had caused her injuries.

63. As a consequence of the injury suffered by the plaintiff, the plaintiffs feared that Bhajan could and would inflict grievous physical harm upon or kill the plaintiff and members of her family through direct physical assault and through the use of magical or mystical powers, if she spoke out against Bhajan or revealed what he had done to her. This belief was the product of mental delusion intentionally induced in the plaintiff by the defendants while she was in the defendants cult, reinforced by actual assaults and threats of assault which occurred while the plaintiff was in the cult, similar threats of assault after the plaintiff left, and other forms of harassment which the defendants perpetrated against the plaintiff after she left the cult (as more fully described in Counts II, III and IV, below).

70. From December 1980 through August, 1985, the plaintiff also lived under the constant fear and reasonable apprehension of physical injury or death if she revealed to any person her experiences while involved with the defendants cult or Bhajan.

73. All of the acts of the defendants described in This Count were done willfully, wantonly and with conscious disregard for the rights of the plaintiff. The defendants conduct in This regard was outrageous, and shocking to the sensibilities of ordinary people.

74. As a direct, proximate and foreseeable consequence of the defendants acts as set forth above, the plaintiff has suffered the physical, psychological and economic injury set forth above at paragraphs 62 and 63, above. In addition the plaintiff suffered severe infections of her bladder, kidneys and other internal organs; injury to her rectum and colon; loss of hair; bloody noses; split lips; bruising over her entire body; swollen tongue to the point where she could not take solid food for several days; soreness and misalignment of her jaw; contraction of herpes simplex and lesser venereal diseases; two abortions; permanent scarring of her internal sex organs and her back; and the tearing of a mole from her back.

77. As a result of the aforementioned physical and psychological injuries, the plaintiff has been limited in the kind of employment she can accept since she left Bhajans cult, and will continue to be so limited on into the future.

B. Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Bhajan, any of the other individual defendants in this case, any officer of employee of any of the corporate defendants in This case, and any other person acting as the agent, employee or accomplice of any of the aforementioned people or entities, from having any contact or communication of any kind with the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, except through the plaintiffs undersigned counsel.

80. From the fall of 1978, and continuing until March 4, 1985, the defendants held the plaintiff in a state of involuntary captivity through a combination of mental coercion, false promises, threats of damnation and unspeakable spiritual torment which defendants knew to be false, and threats of public humiliation, grievous physical injury or death to the plaintiff and her family if she attempted to leave the physical confines of the defendants various compounds where Bhajan directed she live. Any one of the foregoing threats was, by itself, sufficient to constrain the plaintiff.

81. From January, 1981, and continuing until approximately April, 1983, the plaintiff was watched constantly by members of the defendants cult who wou ld report her every move to Bhajan, and telephoned and checked on nightly by Bhajan or another at the direction of Bhajan. This watch was to prevent her from leaving the ashram at Espanola, New Mexico without the permission of Bhajan, or to report her situation to anyone outside the cult.

87. On March 4, 1985, the plaintiff was able to evade the defendants guards stationed outside of her home at the Espanola, New Mexico ashram, and fled the cult to her parents home in the State of Montana, still fearful for her life and safety, and of spiritual damnation and torment.

88. The defendants actions as described in this Count were willful, wanton, outrageous, illegal and totally without justification or authority.

89. As a direct, proximate and foreseeable consequence of the defendants acts as set forth above, the plaintiff has suffered the physical, psychological and economic injury set forth above at paragraphs 62, 63 and 74, above.

B. Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Bhajan, any of the other individual defendants in This case, any officer of employee of any of the corporate defendants in This case, and any other person acting as the agent, employee or accomplice of any of the aforementioned people or entities, from having any contact or communication of any kind with the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, except through the plaintiffs undersigned counsel.

92. During the period in which she was a member of the defendants cult, the plaintiff was systematically subjected to a variety of extreme, outrageous practices by the defendants, which were designed to cause her severe emotional distress. These practices included, but were not limited to:

(f) Repeatedly telling the plaintiff that she was now "useless" to men other than Bhajan, and that no other man would find her in any way attractive or desirable or wish to marry her.

(g) Telling the plaintiff that Bhajan saw in her "aura" that it was her "destiny" to be sexually attacked and die in an auto accident if she left the "protection" of Bhajan, and that she would wind up as a prostitute, and ultimately an accident victim, if she left (all of which "predictions" Bhajan knew to be groundless when he made them).

(h) Knowingly and intentionally subjecting the plaintiff to the aforementioned thought reform process which, by design, undermined and eventually completely destroyed the plaintiffs selfrespect, selfesteem and that concept of self and selfworth known by mental health professionals as "ego". As an integral and necessary part of This process, the plaintiff was constantly harassed, ridiculed, threatened, berated and humiliated publicly and privately any time she attempted to assert her personal rights or independence, and was made to feel wrong, inferior, sacrilegious and spiritually bankrupt for even thinking about deviating from the behaviors prescribed by Bhajan. Any human faults or failings that the plaintiff had were emphasized and exaggerated, and the plaintiff was constantly under pressure to "confess" her inadequacies and "surrender" herself to Bhajan through the group.

94. The defendants conduct as described in this Count was willful, wanton, extreme and outrageous, and was carried out by the defendants with a corrupt motive, for. the purpose of causing the plaintiff extreme mental and emotional distress.

95. The defendants conduct as described in this Count did, in fact, cause the plaintiff extreme mental and emotional distress and anguish, and physical harm resulting from the emotional distress.

96. As a direct, proximate and foreseeable consequence of the defendants acts set forth above, the plaintiff has suffered the physical, psychological, emotional and economic injury set forth in paragraphs 62, 63 and 74, above.

B. Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Bhajan, any of the other individual defendants in This case, any officer of employee of any of the corporate defendants in This case, and any other person acting as the agent, employee or accomplice of any of the aforementioned people or entities, from having any contact or communication of any kind with the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, except through the plaintiffs undersigned counsel.

18 U.S.C. SS19611968.

99. False and fraudulent pretenses, promises and representations made to the plaintiff in this case by Bhajan, and the other defendants at the direction of Bhajan, (as more fully described in paragraphs 3538, 42, 43 and 4659, above) were also made to thousands of other individuals throughout the United States through the U.S. mails, by telephone and by radio and television broadcasts from June 1976 to the present, in violation of 18 U.S.C. S1341 (pertaining to mail fraud), and 18 U.S.C. S1343 (relating to wire fraud).

100. Because it is the very purpose of each of the corporate defendants in this case to disseminate the false and misleading information Bhajan gives them and perpetrate the myths Bhajan has created, virtually every use of the mails by the corporate defendants in this case constitutes the use of the mails for the purpose of executing Bhajans overall scheme to defraud. Specific instances of the use of the mails to transmit the foregoing false and fraudulent representations include:

(b) The mailing of the false and misleading promises and representations designed to induce the plaintiff to travel to the "womens camp," as more fully described in paragraphs 32 and 33, above. Defendant Amrit Kaur, at the direction of Bhajan, made those mailings.

(c) On or about April 23, 1973, defendant Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation mailed an application for exemption from federal income taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code from Los Angeles, California to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in Washington, D.C., which application (including the supporting exhibits) materially misrepresented Bhajans position with what was described as the "parent body" of the Sikh religion in India, as well as the nature, objectives and purposes of the organization, the date of its creation and the particulars of its operation. Similar misrepresentations were made in subsequent correspondence between Internal Revenue Service representatives and defendant Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation pertaining to the same request for tax exempt status. All of these mailings were carried out at the direction of Bhajan.

(d) On or about February 27, 1978 defendant Sin Singh Sahib corporation mailed an "Application for Certificate of Authority" from Los Angeles, California to the New Mexico State Corporation Commission, in order to obtain a certificate of authority to operate in the State of New Mexico. In that application the purposes which the defendant proposed to pursue in the State of New Mexico were materially misrepresented as being "to administer and manage the affairs, property and temporalities of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood religion," when in fact the purpose was as is set forth above. This application was signed by Bhajan, and was mailed at his direction.

(f) On or about March 25, 1978, Articles of Incorporation for defendant 3H0 Foundation were mailed from Los Angeles, California to the Secretary of State of New Mexico, for the purpose of obtaining a certificate of authority to operate in New Mexico. That application materially misrepresented the nature and purpose of the defendant corporation as being "for educational purposes by engaging in the instruction and/or training of the individual for the purpose of improving or developing his capabilities," when in fact the purpose was as is set forth above. This application further misrepresented the governing structure of the defendant corporation, in that it was represented there were Officers and Directors who governed the organizations, when in fact Bhajan and Bhajan alone governed the organization. This application was mailed at the direction of Bhajan.

(g) From time to time, including but not limited to June 9, 1978, the office of the Chancellor to the Sin Singh Sahib corporation in Los Angeles, California, mailed specific instructions to various offices of defendant 3H0 Foundation, as well as to separately incorporated chapters of the 3H0 Foundation in various states, with instructions on how to incorporate the chapters and obtain tax exempt status. Such status was obtained for the purpose of placing privately owned property in the name of the corporation, with private parties, including Bhajan, to enjoy the use of the property taxfree, and Bhajan to ultimately control the property.

101. Because it is the very purpose of each of the corporate defendants in this case to disseminate the false and misleading information Bhajan has generated, virtually every use of the telephone in the operation of the corporate defendants, and every use of the radio and television by Bhajan to promote his organizations and his private yoga lectures, constitutes a use of the wires and electronic media for the purpose of executing Bhajans overall scheme to defraud. Specific instances of the use of the telephone and electronic media to transmit the foregoing false and fraudulent misrepresentations include:

(a) The transmission by telephone, between Espanola, New Mexico and Kalispell, Montana, of the false and misleading promises and representations designed to induce the plaintiff to travel to the "womens camp," as more fully described in paragraphs 32 and 33, above. Those transmissions were made by defendant Amrit Kaur and by Bhajan.

(b) Employees of the 3H0 Foundation regularly used the telephone throughout the relevant time period to make arrangements for the offering for sale by Bhajan of private yoga classes in various states. This promotion of Bhajan as a Yoga master by 3H0 staff was fraudulent as to the misrepresentation of Bhajans qualifications, the misrepresentation of the purpose of the courses, and as an intentional misappropriation of the resources of an allegedly charitable organization. The yoga courses arranged by 3H0 staff themselves promoted the overall scheme by affording the opportunity for Bhajan to attract new students and induct them into his cult through the covert thought reform process described above.

(c) Employees of the 3H0 Foundation regularly arranged radio and television appearance for Bhajan throughout the relevant time period, each time Bhajan was to give private yoga lessons in various states. These promotions, and accompanying radio and television interviews and broadcasts made by Bhajan, were fraudulent as to the misrepresentation of Bhajans qualifications, the misrepresentation of the purpose of the courses, and because they were arranged using the resources of an allegedly charitable organization. The yoga courses which were promoted by the broadcasts themselves furthered and promoted the scheme by affording the opportunity for Bhajan to attract new students and induct them into his cult through the covert thought reform process described above. These broadcasts accompanied virtually every appearance by Bhajan, and in each of the broadcasts in question, Bhajan would repeat the misrepresentations about his personal history, qualifications, purpose and religious office, set forth above. Although the plaintiff has no independent recollection of the specific dates of these broadcasts, such information is known to the defendants, and, upon information and belief, contained without records maintained by the defendants.

(d) Every year from 1976 through 1984 Bhajan made a television address on Channel 7 television in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as part of the annual summer solstice celebration on or about June 21.- Each of these addresses contained, inter alia , the misrepresentations pertaining to Bhajans personal history, qualifications as a yoga master, overall purpose and religious office, which are set forth above. Again, this publicity was arranged using the staff and resources of 3H0 Foundation. Although the plaintiff has no independent recollection of the specific dates of these broadcasts, such information is known to the defendants, and, upon information and belief, contained within records maintained by the defendants.

102. In addition to the mail fraud and wire fraud described above, since 1970, and specifically including the period between June, 1976 and the present, Bhajan has obstructed and affected interstate commerce by extortion and threats of physical violence, and has attempted to do so, and has conspired with the other defendants named in this case to do so, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 (pertaining to interference with commerce through extortion or threats of violence). This extortionate activity included, but is not limited to, the use of the threats of death and grievous bodily harm to the plaintiff and the plaintiffs family if she did not continue to serve the 3H0 Foundation, 3H0 Foundation of New Mexico, and the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, as are more fully described in Counts II and III, above.

103. The use of extortion and threats of physical violence to affect commerce is a standard practice of Bhajan, and is accepted without protest among Bhajans followers, including the other individual defendants named in this case. Specific examples of the use of extortion and threats of physical violence by Bhajan in order to affect commerce, assisted by the other defendants, include:

(a) In November, 1979, in Berkley, California Bhajan threatened a follower with death if he did not move from the San Francisco area to Los Angeles and work as a messenger and assistant to the "Secretariat" (body of secretaries) of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation.

(b) In the winter of 1979, in Los Angeles, California, S. Premka Kaur Khalsa, then a secretary and assistant to Bhajan, later to become the "Secretary General" of Bhajans organization, was threatened with death by Bhajan if she ever left his service (hence, the service of the 3H0 Foundation, the Sikh Dharm a Brotherhood corporation, and the Sin Singh Sahib corporation).

(c) In May, 1985, in Los Angeles, California, Steven Epstein of San Antonio, Texas, was a follower of Bhajan, and was contributing large amounts of money to businesses controlled by Bhajan (including real estate ventures and Khalsa Sunshine, Inc.), and was receiving neither promised remuneration nor proper legal documentation in connection with the transactions. Epsteins wife, Carol, was demanding proper performance by Bhajan and the companies into which Steve Epstein was putting his money and time, and was threatening to divorce Steve Epstein if the matters were not straightened out. Bhajan responded by threatening Steven Epstein with death if he ever "quit working for" Bhajan, and threatening Mr. Epsteins wife that Bhajan, through his organization, would retaliate against Mrs. Epstein if she attempted to divorce her husband. The retaliation against Mrs. Epstein ~would take the form of harassing lawsuits so that Mrs. Epstein "would never have any peace," the hiring of psychologists to testify that she was an unfit mother for her children and a suit for custody over her children, and Mrs. Epstein being "thrown out into the street with nothing."

104. The corporate defendants named in this case are one collective "enterprise," within meaning of the R,I.C.0. Act.

107. Each of the individual defendants named in this Count used their respective offices within the corporate defendants to facilitate Bhajans operation of the corporate defendants through the use and investment of funds acquired by Bhajan through the mail fraud, wire fraud and extortionate activity described above. The individual defendants knew of Bhajans illegal activity and, as corporate officers and directors, condoned it and knowingly accepted on behalf of the corporations the funds that Bhajan was providing them. Each of the defendants has, inter alia, personally participated in the preparation and distribution of the fraudulent mailings described above, and each has personally transmitted threats at Bhajans direction in order to extort cooperation from a current or past follower of Bhajan.

109. Each of the individual defendants named in this Count used their respective offices within the corporate defendants to facilitate Bhajans control of the corporate defendants through the use of mail fraud, wire fraud and extortionate activity, as described above. The individual defendants knew of Bhajans illegal activity and, as corporate officers and directors, condoned it and knowingly accepted on behalf of the corporations the funds that Bhajan was providing them. Each of the defendants has, inter alia, personally participated in the preparation and distribution of the fraudulent mailings described above, and each has personally transmitted threats at Bhajans direction in order to extort cooperation from a current or past follower of Bhajan.

110. The foregoing conduct of Bhajan and the individual defendants named in this Count constitutes participation in the conduct of the corporate defendants affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. S1962(c), and a conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. S1962(a), (b) and (c), all in violation of 18 U.S.C. S1962(d).

A. Entry of a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants Bhajan, Amrit Kaur, Bibiji, Shakti and the corporate defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount equal to three times the actual commercial injury which the plaintiff proves at the trial of this case, plus costs, interest and plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees.

118. From March 1981 through March, 1984 the plaintiff was paid as an employee of the Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, an enterprise in interstate commerce with the title of "Manager," receiving a salary of $350.00 per month.

123. The failure of the defendants to compensate the plaintiff at a rate of not less than one and onehalf times her regular rate for the overtime hours she worked during the relevant time period is contrary to the requirements of S7(a) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. S207(a).

124. The defendants failure to compensate the plaintiff at a rate of at least $3.35 per hour during the relevant time period is contrary to the requirements of S6(a) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. S206(a).

125. The defendants failure to comply with SS6(a) and 7(a) of the FLSA was part of a general pattern of predatory and unfair employment practices, and was in willful disregard of the rights of the plaintiff under the FLSA.

WHEREFORE, under this Count the plaintiff respectfully prays this court will enter a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants Sikh Dharma Brotherhood corporation, Bhajan, Bibiji, Shakti and Ainrit Kaur in the amount of all unpaid overtime, all unpaid minimum wages, times two, plus costs of suit and a reasonable attorneys fee for instituting and prosecuting this action, plus such other relief as the court may deem just, equitable and proper after trial of this case.

130. During the time she was involved in the defendants cult, the plaintiff was forced through coercion and intimidation to labor directly for Bhajan and his corporate entities for several thousand hours without compensation, and was forced to provide sex and companionship to Bhajan as set forth in Count II, above.

131. The plaintiff labored and endured Bhajans verbal, physical and sexual attacks because her will was completely overborne, and she was literally unable to perceive any alternative whatsoever to doing the bidding of Bhajan and his staff, and was convinced that there was literally no way to avoid continued service except death. These beliefs had been induced in her due to a combination of mental conditioning and coercion, posthypnotic suggestion, threats of severe emotional harm and mental anguish, all in an atmosphere of physical assault threats and intimidation which lead her to reasonably believe that she and members of her family would be seriously injured or killed if she disobeyed Bhajan or his staff.

134. To hold the plaintiff in such a condition is prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as 18 U.S.C. §1584, and resulted in the injuries set forth in paragraphs 62, 63 and 74, above, as well as that loss of dignity and humanity which is unique to slavery.

WHEREFORE, under this Count the plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court will exercise its power to vindicate her federally protected interest in remaining free from involuntary servitude, and grant relief for the defendants individual and collective violations of the aforementioned federal statute and provision of the U.S. Constitution, by entering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $2.5 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive or exemplary damages, plus costs of suit and such other relief as this Court may deem just and equitable after trial of this case.

138. These diagnoses, diets administration of drugs and prescriptions for treatment were made without any training or qualifications to make such diagnoses or prescriptions, were medically incorrect and harmful to the plaintiff, were entirely selfserving, and were made with willful, reckless and wanton disregard for the health and safety of the plaintiff.

139. The diets, procedures and devices that Bhajan prescribed were administered to the plaintiff by and through the other defendants named in this Complaint. The plaintiff was disciplined and coerced by the defendants whenever she would resist following Bhajans medical advice.

140. These diets, prescriptions and t1treatments" directly, proximately and foreseeable caused and contributed to the psychological and physical injuries sustained by the plaintiff, as more fully described in paragraphs 62, 63 and 74, above.

144. After the plaintiff left the cult on March 4, 1985, Bhajan, Amrit Kaur, and others at their direction, repeatedly telephoned or personally contacted Plaintiff at the plaintiffs home with threats and warnings of dire consequences if she did not return to the cult or if she disclosed to anyone the events described in this Complaint. These calls were made despite repeated requests by the plaintiff and members of the plaintiffs family that neither Bhajan nor anyone else associated with the cult telephone write or otherwise contact the plaintiff for any reason.

145. In addition to the aforementioned telephone calls and personal contact, Bhajan, Amrit Kaur and other members of the defendants cult attempted to continue to monitor and intimidate the plaintiff after she left the group. These efforts included surveillance; interference with plaintiffs mail; attempts to obtain medical records of the plaintiff through false representations; harassment of plaintiff, her friends and family; and defamation of plaintiff. All of the aforesaid acts constituted an invasion of the plaintiffs privacy.

B. Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Bhajan, any of the other individual defendants in this case, any officer of employee of any of the corporate defendants in this case, and any other person acting as the agent, employee or accomplice of any of the aforementioned people or entities, from having any contact or communication of any kind with the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, except through the plaintiffs undersigned counsel.

149. All of the acts described in each of the foregoing Counts were carried out at the direction of Bhajan, with each of the individual defendants help and participation, with the shared objective of carrying out the will and directives of Bhajan. The will and directives of Bhajan, so far as they are material to this Complaint, were always directed toward obtaining from the plaintiff money and services for the defendants, and sex, money, services and companionship for Bhajan personally, and to conceal the events described in this Complaint from the plaintiff, state and federal authorities and the general public.

150. The defendants actions in this regard constituted a civil conspiracy against the plaintiff.

151. All of the defendants acts described in this Complaint were willful, wanton, outrageous and totally without privilege or justification and caused the plaintiff the emotional, physical, economic and psychological damages set forth above at paragraphs 62, 63 and 74, above.

B. Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting Bhajan, any of the other individual defendants in this case, any officer of employee of any of the corporate defendants in this case, and any other person acting as the agent, employee or accomplice of any of the aforementioned people or entities, from having any contact or communication of any kind with the plaintiff, directly or indirectly, except through the plaintiffs undersigned counsel.